Search for: "COATS v. STATE"
Results 641 - 660
of 853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2010, 2:39 am
But despite attempts to freshen or fix some things in life, their inherent flaws will always show through no matter how many coats of paint you apply. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:54 am
People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:27 am
As a Legal Post article discussing Tossonian v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 3:49 am
A few weeks back, I mentioned the 8th District’s decision in the case of State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:48 am
” H-D U.S.A., LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:45 am
By Andrew DelaneyState v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:49 am
These included "colourful sugar-coated chocolate confectionery", "dragées", "pastilles", "chocolate beans" and even "oblate spheroids". [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 9:32 am
All I can say now is that I hope this development makes the leaders of organizations like NOW and the Feminist Majority worry about whether they did the right thing in supporting the University of Michigan in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:11 am
The argument states that “Justice Harry Anstead noted the “open issue” in a 2007 (Marsh v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 7:17 am
Trulock v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:36 am
Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692, 66 S.Ct. 1187, 90 L.Ed. 1515 (1946), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in IBP, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm
Coop. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 9:27 am
Even though it could be done at no cost to the state. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:09 am
Just last month, in the case of Jane Doe v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 12:09 pm
See Extreme Coatings, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 12:09 pm
See Extreme Coatings, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
In finding that the mark consisted of the shape that gave the product substantial value, the CJEU stated that this concept was not limited to the shape of products having only artistic or ornamental value and that it also covered products with “essential functional characteristics”. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 7:16 am
All states require proof of reliance and causation. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s statement in Reiter v. [read post]
