Search for: "CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, Section (C)"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
United States, which addressed whether a defendant sentenced pursuant to a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement is eligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:24 pm
The DA's question to the AG: "Does TYC have the authority under § 87.85(g)(3) of the Texas Administrative Code to require an offender to register as a sex offender, notwithstanding that provision conflicts with the juvenile court's authority under article 62.352(b)(1) and (c) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and the juvenile court has opted to exercise its authority to defer a decision on registration? [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm
Review by Court. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:02 am
The Sixth Circuit disagreed, finding that Ogden cites nothing in the record to suggest the district court actually excluded the chat logs from the restitution hearing. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:55 am
Home Invasion in Massachusetts is criminalized under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 265 Section 18(c). [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Attorney Gen. of the US, No. 06-1887In the context of the applicability of the new definitions of aggravated felony to immigration cases commenced prior to the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), "actions taken" in section 321(c) of IIRIRA refers to orders and decisions of an IJ or the BIA which apply the "aggravated felony" definitions in 8 U.S.C. section 1101(a)(43) to determine the availability of hardship relief. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:11 pm
Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:16 pm
With respect to the district court’s finding that the United States is likely to succeed on the merits of its claims that sections 2(B), 3, 5(C), and 6 are facially preempted, the issues presented are: a. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
INS, No. 03-41049, 05-3319 Petition for review of an order denying cancellation of removal for failure to satisfy the seven-year continuous residence requirement of the now-repealed INA section 212(c) is denied where an application of the "criminal-offense stop-time rule" under 8 U.S.C. section 1229b(d)(1)(B) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act of 1996 ("IIRIRA") to petitioner's pre-IIRIRA offense was not… [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
C-46, the Terrorism section. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:01 am
Numerous participants in an expansive mortgage fraud scheme were sentenced to prison on Monday, October 27, 2014, and Tuesday, October 28, 2014, by Chief United States District Judge James C. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Washington, No. 07-1523, 07-1884, 07-2541 Federal district courts lack the inherent power to vacate a sentence procured by fraud, any such power having been abrogated by the enactment of 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c) and the amendments to FRCP 35. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
The district court granted Virginia summary judgment. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:11 pm
The district court granted Virginia summary judgment. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:56 am
District Court for the District of New Jersey 2012). [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am
The Hamburg District Court stated that the WLAN operators could not be held liable as perpetrators or accomplices with regard to a liability in tort since the privilege rule of Section 8(1) of the Telemedia Act(1) for service providers applied. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:20 am
In any event, his being terminated would result in the discontinuation of any Section 207-c benefits, including any entitlement to medical treatment and hospital care in connection with his work-related injury, [Section 207-c.5, General Municipal Law]. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 12:27 pm
§ 3559(c), not by the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
Insurer’s Bid to Dismiss Complaint Seeking Cyber Policy Coverage for Payment Instruction Loss Denied
17 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
SS&C filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of New York against the insurer. [read post]
