Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA" Results 641 - 660 of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2019, 3:24 pm by Steve Kalar
 Under Daubert the Court of Appeals acts as a gatekeeper that evaluates the reliability and admissibility of the testimony of expert witnesses in federal court. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:06 am
Finally, the Court of Appeals upheld the district court’s finding that the application of ESA Sections 7 and 9 to the California delta smelt does not violate the Commerce Clause in the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
On the other hand, other decisions from federal district courts in California have found that plaintiffs must do no more than plead the elements of a section 1595 claim, including in a case where a Jane Doe plaintiff sued the same defendants that Plaintiffs sue here—those entities that own and operate Pornhub—on very similar grounds. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 11:37 am by Anonymous
Recently, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal requested additional briefing from my former office on the question of whether to hear the case en banc. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:49 am by Eric Goldman
Ison could still appeal the case to the California Supreme Court, but the odds of them taking the case is virtually zero, so I think the case is over. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, January 09, 2008 US v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by Russell Spivak, Adam Aliano
In February of this year, however, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the dismissal. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 10:09 am
App. 3d 626, the California Court of Appeal held that attorneys who participate in the filing or maintenance of litigation without probable cause are personally liable for malicious prosecution of a civil action. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am by Rahul Bhagnari
Twelve years to the day after the Supreme Court struck down bans on sodomy in Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:15 am
Rptr. 348 (1975), the California Court of Appeal held that there is no right to a jury trial in a derivative action. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm by Greg May
” When a court begins its analysis with that sentence, as the court in Le v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:50 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Court of Appeal therefore rejected the plaintiff group’s contentions raised by cross-appeal, and reversed the trial court’s judgment granting a writ. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of Washington – Division 1:  The Republic of Kazakhstan v. [read post]