Search for: "Call v. Superior Court" Results 641 - 660 of 4,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
Superior Court (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 8, 13, 25 (Burdick); Walden v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 7:41 am by Russell Knight
You can file an appeal to tell a set of superior judges that the circuit judge made the wrong decision. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Reymond F. testified that he did not do “anything” with the child during these visits, was not called “dad” and did not call the child “son. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 8:38 am by Russell Knight
A divorce judge will be aware that a litigant is, essentially, writing a report to his or her superiors while they conduct their case and object to their opponent’s case. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Superior Court (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1185); sellers of used products (Wilkinson v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:36 am by JURIST Staff
V Ramana deploring the Indian justice system as “colonial” and calling for its “Indianisation” for the benefit of ordinary litigants. [read post]
A three-judge panel of the Wake County Superior Court in North Carolina permanently enjoined the state’s controversial voter ID law, holding that it discriminates against Black voters. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Pagano
Lynch asserted that the majority “constitutionalize[s] a rule … better left to the executive and the Congress,” called on the Supreme Court to step in, and asserted that the majority’s “error … will reverberate in thousands of immigration bond proceedings. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:27 pm by Mark Tabakman
The proper jurisdiction for these suits, as the Seyfarth post notes, became open to debate after a US Supreme Court 2017 decision in Bristol Myers Squibb v Superior Court. [read post]