Search for: "Charles v. United States Government"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2015, 2:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:51 am
Indeed, in State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm
United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 (1968)4. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:44 am
[Charles W. [read post]
U.S. Supreme Court Reverses Federal Torts Claim Act Dismissal Stating that Equitable Tolling Applied
26 May 2015, 5:32 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 4:52 pm
State v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:32 am
United States, No. 13-1487: When the defendant has been convicted of a felony and can no longer legally possess firearms, and his guns have been seized by the government, "a court may approve the transfer of a felon's guns consistently with §922(g) if, but only if, the recipient will not grant the felon control over those weapons. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm
United States Florida: a former superintendent has had his lawsuit against the accounting firm Mauldin & Jenkins dismissed. [read post]
Copyright in declaring API code: here's why I don't have any competition concerns (Oracle v. Google)
15 May 2015, 7:11 am
There's probably no appeals court in the whole wide world that hears more attempts to monopolize functionality than the Federal Circuit, which hears all patent infringement and validity appeals in the United States. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:58 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 8:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
In the Cohen case, Justice Charles Fried of the Supreme Judicial Court concluded that Congress was effectively implementing state debtor-creditor laws when it enacted Medicaid trust laws: “We are confirmed in this reading by something akin to legislative history: a consideration of the source from which the legislative language appears to have been taken. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
In the Cohen case, Justice Charles Fried of the Supreme Judicial Court concluded that Congress was effectively implementing state debtor-creditor laws when it enacted Medicaid trust laws: “We are confirmed in this reading by something akin to legislative history: a consideration of the source from which the legislative language appears to have been taken. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:42 pm
Justice Rouleau stated in O’Donohue v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am
Byrd Center for Legislative StudiesMicki Kaufman, CUNY Graduate Center, “Everything on Paper Will Be Used Against Me: Quantifying Kissinger”Billy Wayson, “Making Sense of Digital Information Using Qualitative Analysis SoftwareTom Faith, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “Mapping the Foreign Relations of the United States Series”James Wyatt, Robert C. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 11:02 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm
So, understandably, some people believe that states could limit the agenda of an Article V convention. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
United States Georgia’s Supreme Court has ruled against a woman who claimed she was stalked online. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:15 am
State v. [read post]
