Search for: "Chase v. Chase"
Results 641 - 660
of 3,602
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2022, 5:38 pm
Newman v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:24 pm
E.g., instead of citing to Thorner v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 5:14 am
Michael Lewis Wells (University of Georgia Law School) has posted Scott V. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
JURIST Paper Chase reports: US security firm Blackwater [JURIST news archive] on Wednesday reached a settlement agreement in seven federal lawsuits filed by Iraqi citizens. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:04 pm
Instead, when written properly, it is 14 words: Thorner v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 2:42 pm
In Crown v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 1:16 am
Click here to go to www.nylj.com
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., petitioner-respondent v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The recent Kentucky Supreme Court decision in JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:45 am
Chevy Chase Bank [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:55 am
Creating Hammer v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 2:00 am
Get the whole case, Phillips v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d 893, 893-894… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d 893, 893-894… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d 893, 893-894… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d 893, 893-894… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d 893, 893-894… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d 893, 893-894… [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:37 am
Chevy Chase [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:26 am
Lucyna Kubisztal Smith and Danny Smith v. [read post]