Search for: "Child v. Warne"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2017, 7:01 am
The officers were in Penree's home unlawfully, he was not fleeing or resisting, the officers purportedly arrested him for a noncriminal offense, they saw he was holding his small child, and they gave no warning" [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:30 pm
In the case of R (o.t.a P & others) v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:37 pm
In Berg v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm
Ukip MEP Jane Collins could face bankruptcy after she failed to pay damages to Rotherham’s three Labour MPs over remarks she made about the town’s child abuse scandal. [read post]
10 May 2017, 11:11 am
This was the main issue in Weigand v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:41 am
The Court held that the use of the prior charges in this case to exclude the reasonable belief defence amounted to a disproportionate interference with AB’s art 8 right because the prior charges related to different kinds of offences to the current offence of consensual sexual activity with an older child, and so did not give the official warning or official notice. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:08 am
Additional Resources: Canney v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:17 am
Additional Resources: Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:20 am
2C:14–2(b), and two counts of second-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:02 am
” At the Special Education Law Blog, Jim Gehrl weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:32 am
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court held that there was interference with ECHR, art 8, and that this was disproportionate, because prior charges did not give the official warning or notice that consensual sexual activity with children between the ages of 13 and 16 was an offence. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm
Where judges are satisfied that evidence shows things have changed or could change in time, say with the right support, in a time frame realistic for the child (eg. new parental insight, parenting changes or capacity to accept support), they regularly find permanent removal unnecessary and some other option best. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 10:33 am
In Blackwell v. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
” HPLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:23 am
Note that the law doesn’t limit itself to ads, so new crimes and torts could reach even non-commercial activity related to child sex trafficking (whatever that means). [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am
However, Katz v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:36 am
In Czyzewski v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 10:45 am
On March 21, 2017, our Supreme Court decided JI v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
”[28] V. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:35 am
And in United States v. [read post]
