Search for: "Childs v. Gross"
Results 641 - 660
of 875
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:59 am
The stipulation noted that the father's annual gross income was $475,000, whereas the mother had no income. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:04 am
Husband’s gross income was $475,000 per year, and the Child Support Standards Act (CSSA) would have produced child support of approximately $12,000 per month. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:46 am
Perform an Alimony v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
Supreme Court's decision in Hamilton v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:43 am
NL will apparently “make legal history by becoming the first child to sue his local health authority under the Human Rights Act“. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:44 pm
That sort of stuff should gross you out, not turn you on.But if for some reason your brain is erroneously wired, resist the temptation. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 10:31 pm
The recently decided case of J.H. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:38 am
Child Custody Affidavit, Form 902(d). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:37 am
DE v AB [2010] EWHC 3792 (Fam), just reported on Bailii, concerned a father's appeal against a Schedule 1 Children Act award. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:08 pm
DiFILIPPO v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm
Here’s a gross oversimplification:1. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
A couple of child molestation cases come up. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
Maryland v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:38 pm
See US v. [read post]
