Search for: "Commonwealth v. Good" Results 641 - 660 of 949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2012, 8:41 pm
  Both the Insurance Partnership of Massachusetts and the Commonwealth Connector provide referrals to programs that can be cost-effective for small firm employers. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm by Stephen Griffin
  There was good reason to believe that when peace was restored and federal war powers evaporated, the former Confederate states would re-enslave those who had been emancipated by the Union. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Could have made a categorical exclusion, but it didn’t do that.Viewpoint v. content based. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm by Bexis
  Ali is another such case:By its own terms, however, the VCPA does not apply to “[a]ny aspect of a consumer transaction which aspect is authorized under laws or regulations of this Commonwealth or the United States, or the formal advisory opinions of any regulatory body or official of this Commonwealth or the United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
One of the significant common features of Grosse v Purvis, Doe v ABC and Doe v Yahoo! [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am by Stephen Page
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am by INFORRM
Desmond said UKIP was a party for “good, ordinary British people”. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  (This is the deep meaning of the fact, for example, that four of the American states—Massachusetts, Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Kentucky (originally, of course, part of Virginia)—styled themselves as “commonwealths,” i.e., communities organized around the seeking of a common good. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
Commonwealth of Kentucky Docket: 08-651 Argument date: October 13, 2009 Question presented: Criminal defendants have a constitutional right to "effective" counsel. [read post]