Search for: "Cook v State" Results 641 - 660 of 3,790
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2020, 1:45 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As discussed here, in the landmark June 2019 decision of Marchand v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:38 am by admin
  The professional must be acting within the scope of her/his license, registration, or certification under the State of licensure/certification, and may not exceed the scope of the license/certification of similar professionals in the State in which the action or omission occurs. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:28 pm by Michael Cook
  Services must be provided by individuals licensed by the state to provide personal care services, or in a manner that is otherwise consistent with state requirements. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 2:00 pm by Steven Boutwell
App. 6, 858 P.2d 1332 (1993) (losses caused by odors from illegal methamphetamine cooking were direct physical loss); and Murray v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:53 am by Sophie Corke
This gave another view on the issues introduced earlier in the day from Trevor Cook’s perspective as a practitioner. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am by Sophie Corke
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:52 am by Whitney Jones Roy and Angela Reid
  Specifically, the Court found that declining to hear Cal Chambers’ claim was appropriate because Cal Chambers appeared to be seeking to avoid an unfavorable decision in a state case (CERT v. [read post]