Search for: "Corpus v. State" Results 641 - 660 of 2,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2015, 6:59 am by Mark S. Humphreys
That question is addressed in a 1967, Corpus Christi Court of Appeals case styled, Phoenix Insurance Company v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:42 am
Solicitor General Robert Bork in the Second Circuit to overturn racketeering and fraud convictions in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
These stark realities are met by the suggestion that it is lawful to compel an American citizen to submit to illegal imprisonment on the assumption that he might, after going to the Assembly Center, apply for his discharge by suing out a writ of habeas corpus, as was done in the Endo case, supra. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
These stark realities are met by the suggestion that it is lawful to compel an American citizen to submit to illegal imprisonment on the assumption that he might, after going to the Assembly Center, apply for his discharge by suing out a writ of habeas corpus, as was done in the Endo case, supra. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
These stark realities are met by the suggestion that it is lawful to compel an American citizen to submit to illegal imprisonment on the assumption that he might, after going to the Assembly Center, apply for his discharge by suing out a writ of habeas corpus, as was done in the Endo case, supra. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:15 pm by Unknown
Mescalero Apache Tribal Court (Writ of Habeas Corpus)Magee v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in Williams v New York State and Ahlers v New York State Division of Parole that the imposition of a special parole condition is discretionary in nature and ordinarily beyond judicial review as long as it is made in accordance with law and no positive statutory requirement is violated. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in Williams v New York State and Ahlers v New York State Division of Parole that the imposition of a special parole condition is discretionary in nature and ordinarily beyond judicial review as long as it is made in accordance with law and no positive statutory requirement is violated. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:21 am
On March 2, 2009, in No. 08-6, District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:44 pm by Kalvis Golde
Baasiri 23-568Issue: Whether a defendant’s status as an instrumentality of a foreign state under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 18 – 19 June 2012. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 7:41 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Reversing them has become a significant part of the Supreme Court's workload.In today's decision in White v. [read post]