Search for: "Cox v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
” (Cortina v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
June 23, 2011) (allegation that defendant “failed to train, warn or educate” physicians failed to state a plausible claim because no such duty exists); Lemon v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:10 am
(See Watts v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:59 am
" State ex rel. [read post]
31 May 2009, 11:11 pm
Cox (1987) 197 Cal.App.3d 381, 388, 242 Cal.Rptr. 851; Zambrano v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, “a plaintiff must establish that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages ***” ( Island Properties & Equities, LLC v Cox, 93 AD3d 639, 640 [2d Dept 2012]; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:32 pm
Cox, 481 So. 2d 517 (3d DCA 1985). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:32 pm
Cox, 481 So. 2d 517 (3d DCA 1985). [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
See International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:49 am
Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG (formerly known as Victoria), heard 20 – 21 January 2014. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:14 am
US. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:13 am
Knowles v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 11:41 am
The Reagan administration challenged the constitutional validity of these provisions in Morrison v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:56 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:50 am
The court held that classifications based on sexual orientation were subject to a heightened scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:20 am
In his opening remarks, Chairman Cox noted that any proposal should be respectful of state law, should be measured and incremental, and should not create new rights for shareholders but should vindicate existing rights. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
In today’s column, I criticize its reliance on the views of liberal scholars.In a single paragraph, Justice Alito cites John Hart Ely, Archibald Cox, Laurence Tribe, Mark Tushnet, Philip Bobbitt, and Akhil Amar for the proposition that the reasoning of Roe v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
In its decision, the Sixth Circuit expressed skepticism about the states’ standing to bring suit, the reviewability of the Mayorkas memorandum under the APA, and the merits of the states’ substantive claims. [read post]
