Search for: "Crawford for Crawford v. Crawford" Results 641 - 660 of 2,334
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
  A: Edison’s Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze, aka Fred Ott’s Sneeze, in 1894  ____ Q: Name the Joan Crawford movie at issue in the 1940 Supreme Court case Sheldon v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Arizona 13-735Issue: Whether an autopsy report created as part of a homicide investigation, and asserting that the death was indeed caused by homicide, is “testimonial” under the Confrontation Clause framework established in Crawford v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 8:15 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Articles Elizabeth B Crawford & Janeen M Carruthers, Connection and Coherence Between and Among European Instruments in the Private International Law of Obligations This article considers points of connection and coherence between and among the Rome I Regulation, the Rome II Regulation, and Regulation 1215, and relevant predecessor instruments. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Finally, the fact that their preparation was incidental to a police surveillance operation does not make them inadmissible as was held in People v Guidice. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant’s basis for the objections was his inability to exercise his constitutional right to confront the witnesses against him as outlined by the Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:20 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Crawford The course of international law over time needs to be understood if international law is to be understood. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Crawford v Washington and People v Brown held that the Confrontation Clause bars the admission of testimonial out-of-court statements made by a witness who is not subject to cross-examination. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:17 am
In a lesson about using “flimsy grounds” for stopping people on suspicion of texting while driving, an Ontario Superior Court judge has thrown out an alcohol-related conviction after a cop stopped a driver he thought had a cellphone in his hand while at a red light.The officer “clearly operated on a hunch,” says Richard Litkowski, an associate at Hicks Adams LLP who represented Imran Mughal on the appeal of his conviction in R. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:13 am by Glenn
That competition concern harkens all the way back to United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 1:34 pm
However, the records inspection and maintenance and the calibration of the instrument were not testimonial hearsay as such his confrontation rights were not violated under the principle established Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36 (2004). [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” (The footnote provides the name and citation of the opinion: Crawford v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:24 pm by Will Baude
(Will Baude) Two weeks ago, Jonathan noted that in an interview with Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, Judge Richard Posner said that he thought he’d been wrong to uphold Indiana’s voter ID statute in Crawford v. [read post]