Search for: "Cross v. Powers"
Results 641 - 660
of 4,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2016, 8:49 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 10:05 am
(Cross-posted at Slate's Convictions blog) [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm
June 12th is Loving Day, a holiday celebrating the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:33 am
A transcript of the arguments in Arizona v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:32 pm
The Whitfield amendment turned this study bill into a substantive bill by indefinitely delaying two major Clean Air Act regulations, the utility MACT rule, which reduces mercury and other toxic emissions from power plants, and the cross-state air pollution rule, which reduces sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from power plants that cross state boundaries and harm downwind communities' efforts to achieve healthy air quality. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:54 am
(3) Data retention remains doubtful in terms of fundamental rights compliance: in the ECHR, S & Marper v UK questions mass monitoring of the unconvicted, Copland v UK reiterates that traffic data is covered by Article 8 (as I argue here); the German courts are considering various challenges (summarised by Digital Rights Ireland: 1 | 2), and DRI itself is engaged in a challenge to the Directive. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 6:55 am
The post Catching Up on NetChoice v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
In the Gambia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:21 pm
He was also mentioned in the course of cross-examination, in speeches and in the summing up. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:16 am
Williams v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:00 am
It need not be followed, for example, when an agency's action is challenged as either unconstitutional or wholly beyond its grant of power, or when resort to an administrative remedy would be futile or when its pursuit would cause irreparable injury" citing see Town of Oyster Bay v Kirkland, 81 AD3d 812. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 6:27 am
There's not much you can't say . . .State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:16 am
Williams v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
It need not be followed, for example, when an agency's action is challenged as either unconstitutional or wholly beyond its grant of power, or when resort to an administrative remedy would be futile or when its pursuit would cause irreparable injury" citing see Town of Oyster Bay v Kirkland, 81 AD3d 812. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:16 am
Williams v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 1:54 pm
No. 2 v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:34 am
Even if Roe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm
He does possess that power. [read post]
