Search for: "D&M General Contracting Inc" Results 641 - 660 of 769
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2010, 11:42 am by helpme123
``At an Indian law firm, generally your potential is not recognized at an early stage,'' D'souza said. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm by Mike Aylward
  As the dissenters point out, however, there is some irony in this given the general reluctance of New York courts to award punitive damages in most cases. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 6:17 am by Susan Brenner
If you’d like to read more about that issue, check out the law review article you can find here. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v Unilever plc & Ors (IPKat)… [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The restriction upheld in Allen, triggered by the shareholder's death, is akin to a more general right of first offer found in many shareholder and operating agreements. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee:… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee:… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee:… [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 11:27 am by Susan Brenner
SRG Consulting, Hospitalist Physicians, ince and Steven R. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:29 am
The plaintiff, D'Amato Investments, LLC, brought this action against the defendant, David Sutton, to recover the amount allegedly due under a commercial lease between the plaintiff and Chimaera, Inc. [read post]