Search for: "D. Crawford" Results 641 - 660 of 923
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
There are too many people to acknowledge and thank here, but on a personal note, I'd like to give a special thanks to Ariane de Vogue and Dennis Powell, two dedicated journalists I was privileged to work with on the legal team. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 2:49 pm
I’d like to add one other positive thing to the list that I’ve not seen discussed (but maybe I’ve missed). [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:16 am
On October 6th, the full committee held a hearing on capital markets regulatory reform and heard testimony from the President of NASAA, Denny Crawford (Texas Commissioner of Securities) and Richard Ketchum (CEO of FINRA), among others. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 2:55 am
  A new judge had taken over from the one who'd heard the case, and granted the motion, sentencing him to ten years, then granting judicial release; this was done with the local prosecutor specifically stipulating that he had no objection to it. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 11:55 am
 How closely do you need to read Crawford v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:23 am
Young, for example, makes a complete hash of Crawford. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 9:00 pm
Soon after its release, I felt resistance by many judges to blank">Crawford v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
”   It would have been better if I’d given the second answer that came to mind. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 3:32 am
Here’s an even better question:   if the Ohio Supreme Court got a do-over on the issue of whether consecutive sentencing runs afoul of Apprendi/Blakeley, is there any way they’d come to the same decision they did in Foster, in light of Ice? [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 1:02 pm
  Klein, Crawford and Alchian's seminal analysis of vertical integration and the holdup problem (JLE, 1978) ranks #30 on this list. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Boston, MA; William Crawford, President) Beautiful Carpet Corp. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
   In Melendez-Diaz only an affidavit from the analyst was offered, while in Crager the analyst, albeit not the one who’d actually performed the tests, had testified. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
  A different panel had decided Greenspan, and had acknowledged the conflict with Crawford, but dismissed it by declaring that Crawford was “simply in error. [read post]