Search for: "DOES 1-98 " Results 641 - 660 of 2,167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2019, 5:12 am by MBettman
Charles Shutrump & Sons Co., 21 Ohio St.3d 98 (1986) (R.C. 2305.131 only limits actions arising out of tort, and does not limit actions for breach of contract, which continue to be governed by the fifteen-year statute of limitations found in R.C. 2305.06. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:15 pm
  And yet consider those criticisms in light of what one now understands as the theoretical model under which this referendum was structured.1. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Hayley Evans
While France does not have the same sort of legislation as Germany, its ability to prosecute is drawn from its own universal jurisdiction law. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Cardozo Introduction Professor of Jurisprudence, Brian Leiter,[1] argues that even though economics, psychology, and history play a large role in the study of law today, philosophy has been an integral part of the academic discipline for a much longer time. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
App. 2005). 1 The City appealed the original jury verdict, and the case was heard by the Court of Appeals of Ohio inHilliard v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Under MCLA 213.62(1); MSA 8.265(12)(1), jury procedure in condemnation cases is governed by the same rules as are other civil a [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
Minutes of the oral proceedings - here.The technical board of appeal (TBA)'s position is unequivocal: the AC does not have the power to amend the EPC using the Rules. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
T 0219/98, for example, found that purity is not usually a distinguishing feature (Headnote, see also r. 4.8). [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:36 pm by Heather Donkers
” The fact that it is an element of the offence in s.162(1)(c) that observation or recording be done for a sexual purpose does not make it inappropriate to consider the purpose of the observation or recording in assessing whether it was done in breach of a reasonable expectation of privacy, as required by s. 162(1). [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:36 pm by Heather Donkers
” The fact that it is an element of the offence in s.162(1)(c) that observation or recording be done for a sexual purpose does not make it inappropriate to consider the purpose of the observation or recording in assessing whether it was done in breach of a reasonable expectation of privacy, as required by s. 162(1). [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:44 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
Despite criticism by the Association of Foreign Banks in Germany, the Bill does not refer to services provided by UK branches of EEA institutions back to the EU. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 6:04 am by MBettman
 98 (1980) (A defendant, who placed drugs in someone else’s purse, lacked standing to challenge the search of that purse.) [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The EBA had held that Article 53(b) EPC does not exclude plants from patentability, even if they are obtained through an essentially biological process. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
BACKGROUNDThe facts recited in this opinion are the court's findings based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at a one-day trial held on October 1, 2018. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:42 am by Jessica Kroeze
Only a purity of 97.91% could be obtained.- Consequently, D2/D3 did not anticipate the subject-matter of claim 1 at issue.- The procedure described in example 16 of D1 led to amorphous LH having a purity of 97.91%, i.e. outside the range specified in claim 1 at issue.- The rationale developed in T 990/96 and T 728/98 was in conflict with the principle that for concluding lack of novelty, there must be a direct and unambiguous disclosure.- The purity level specified in… [read post]