Search for: "Deas v. Deas"
Results 641 - 660
of 825
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2010, 12:27 pm
Eneh v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:33 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:53 am
Recently we looked at Florida v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
See, e.g., Cox v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:05 am
In Jama v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
Silva mailed these packages of cash from Switzerland into the U.S., as outlined by his "statement of facts" filed in U.S.A. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:07 am
Similarly in Kyllo v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:58 am
In US v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:25 am
They observed what the DEA agent thought to be a phenylacetone laboratory. . . . [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:44 am
Last year, I wrote about the Supreme Court’s decision in Caperton v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 8:59 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
Prescription drugs are invaluable tools in the practice of medicine, used to treat numerous illnesses and diseases. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:28 am
I’m only going to point out that the court’s ruling in Singer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 12:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 7:07 am
A week ago, I posted an entry about a Maryland case in which the Court of Appeals of Maryland strained to find that a sergeant's testimony did not violate Maryland's counterpart to Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b), which provides that... [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
The Ninth Circuit holds today that it's okay for the DEA, and presumably any other law enforcement official, to come into your driveway, without probable cause, climb under your vehicle, and place a tracking device thereupon.The theory is that you've got no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in: (1) your driveway, since a neighbor could go there on the way to your house, (2) the undercarriage of your car, since a child might potentially look for a lost ball there, or… [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
In People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
