Search for: "Direct Sales Co. v. United States"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,027
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2012, 4:15 am
Instead the Supreme Court held that Section 10(b) reaches frauds only where “the purchase or sale is made in the United States, or involves a security listed on a domestic exchange” (slip op. at 21). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
And Congress surely has it within its authority to decide, rather than at the point of sale, given an insurance-based mechanism, it makes sense to regulate it earlier. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
When GE purchased WMC in 2004, all that WMC did was “whole loan sales,” meaning that it would loan out money for mortgages, and then sell the loans to Wall Street investment banks, who would package and securitize those loans. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 12:08 pm
In 2006 and early 2007, HTI did not perform as well as projected because it was not able to secure an expected contract with the United States military. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:45 pm
“ Local Loan Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am
(Note this smooth move, which also pops up later: a sales restriction is now a limit on speech! [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
Rates of C. difficile, the most common hospital-based infection in the United States, continue to climb. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
Pursuant to the Child Support Standards Act (DRL 240[1-b] ), plaintiff (father) was directed to pay $2,887 per month in child support based on his imputed income of $160,000 as the sole proprietor of a veterinary practice. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am
ANALYSIS The cornerstones of plaintiffs’ separation of powers challenge were laid in the mid-19th century when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:20 am
The measure, co-authored by Rep. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 8:59 am
New York courts have interpreted § 684(3)(c) to mean in essence that the sale of the first franchise unit is exempt from registration if the unit was only offered to a maximum of two people (See BMW Co., Inc. et al. v Workbench Inc. et al. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm
United States, 362 U. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 1:43 am
Lurgi Energie Und Entsorgung GmbH- the matter was dismissed for becoming infructuous on 07.01.2007- see order) 09.03.06: Delhi High Court stayed proceedings befor it.03.04.07: In view of the dismissal of Civil Appeal 339/ 2003, the Supreme Court listed the matter alongwith Civil Appeal 7019/2005-Bharat Aluminium Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:33 pm
Co., Ltd., v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:40 pm
United States Bank Nat’l Ass’n, __ Cal. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:10 am
CRP/Extell then began offering condominium units for sale. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
In line with art. 3 of directive 2001/24/EC, the district court held that the administrative or judicial authorities of the home member state of a credit institution are alone competent to decide on implementation measures for a credit institution, including branches established in other member states. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:32 am
See Authentic Beverages Co. v. [read post]
