Search for: "Distinctive Brands, Inc."
Results 641 - 660
of 1,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2010, 6:30 am
Williams Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 9:59 am
Protecting a brand normally starts with selecting a brand. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
Long Bow Group, Inc. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 12:59 pm
They argued to the district court that claim amendments during PTAB review are a distinct possibility and, in doing so, gave VA an opportunity to respond to this argument below. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 10:20 pm
Tektronix, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm
Morton Grove Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:12 pm
The argument turned to the critical distinction between interbrand competition, among different brands, and intrabrand competition, among sellers of the same brand. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am
Johnson & Son, Inc. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 11:34 am
The Commission's responses to Chiquita Brands, Inc. and MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. were the same. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:38 pm
[See TTABlog comment here].Hunt Control Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 3:30 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 9:47 pm
Brand Nme Beds, LLC, 500 F.Supp.2d 296, 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2007); AutoZone, Inc. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:37 pm
., Inc. and Homer TLC, Inc. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
and therefore serve as a brand or source identifier? [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
(Class 46) Brand owners give guarded welcome to Community trade mark initiative (Managing Intellectual Property) Finland Finland, the brand (Class 46) France Is France going to ban mentioning Bordeux, Burgundy, Champagne and Cognac online? [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 1:26 pm
Here are the key facts in the case of Southwestern Consulting, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm
Lexis 1688, at *36) to Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
" [quoting Electronic Design & Sales Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:51 am
In Elliot v Google, Inc., CV-12-1072-PHX-MHB, Elliot claims that Google’s once distinctive mark GOOGLE® has become generic and lacks trademark significance due to its common use as a transitive verb. [read post]
26 May 2009, 8:50 am
Hasbro, Inc., 1995 U.S. [read post]
