Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 641 - 660 of 107,880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2015, 7:39 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
In a blow to those employees who suffer from stress and anxiety caused by abusive employers, a California Court of Appeals has determined that “an employee’s inability to work under a particular supervisor because of anxiety and stress related to the supervisor’s standard oversight of the employee’s job performance does not constitute a mental disability” under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:39 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
In a blow to those employees who suffer from stress and anxiety caused by abusive employers, a California Court of Appeals has determined that “an employee’s inability to work under a particular supervisor because of anxiety and stress related to the supervisor’s standard oversight of the employee’s job performance does not constitute a mental disability” under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:39 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
In a blow to those employees who suffer from stress and anxiety caused by abusive employers, a California Court of Appeals has determined that “an employee’s inability to work under a particular supervisor because of anxiety and stress related to the supervisor’s standard oversight of the employee’s job performance does not constitute a mental disability” under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. [read post]
In the employment world, the slightest uncertainty in a termination provision can and often does lead to costly litigation to determine how much money should change hands. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 2:16 am by INFORRM
A number of other actions are awaiting the outcome of the appeal. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 8:25 pm by Howard Bashman
“Shooting of Georgia appeals judge ‘does not appear to be homicide,’ DA says”: Chelsea Prince of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has this report. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 1:33 pm by Derek Muller
The Michigan Court of Appeals (opinion here) follows Arizona and Minnesota in concluding there is… Continue reading The post Michigan Court of Appeals keeps Trump on ballot, holds state law does not allow investigation into candidate qualifications appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:30 pm by Howard Bashman
“Age bias law does not cover job applicants — U.S. appeals court”: Jonathan Stempel of Reuters has this report on an 8-to-4 en banc ruling that the U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 2:05 pm by Ian Patterson
As JEQ discovered, OHA does not have jurisdiction to resolve appeals of status determinations for all of the SBA’s socioeconomic programs; HUBZone status determinations being a notable exception. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 6:47 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
This exception, however, does not apply when the initial complaint was voluntarily dismissed by the party who filed the claim. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 6:37 am by Daniel Miller
The New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, recently reversed the ruling of an intermediate appellate court and held that the inclusion of information that is not “false, misleading, obfuscatory, or unrelated” does not void an otherwise proper notice to borrowers sent pursuant to New York Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law § 1304, and thus does not bar a subsequently filed foreclosure action. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:00 pm
But on appeal those orders were vacated because Virginia (where the final divorce decree was entered) no longer had jurisdiction over the case.So does the previous order before the appealed modification stand? [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 2:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
  (The appeal itself, filed Friday, is discussed in the post below.) [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:04 am by Virginia Hunt
     If the insurer files an appeal and a Motion for Stay, the insurer does not have to comply with the hearing officer’s decision until 10 days after the appeals officer rules on the motion. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 7:17 am by Randall Hodgkinson
(This may be why this is an unpublished opinion, a fairly unusual situation in the KSC)In any case, the KSC decided the two issues before it, reaffirming its precedent that the state has to present sufficient evidence of alternative means and that the prosecutor's argument does not functionally elect a means. [read post]