Search for: "Doe Entities 1-50"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
Ready to wave that foam #1 finger? [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 11:28 am
If your Company is a for-profit entity, the BABA requirements may apply to you. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 1:19 pm
The Act also prohibits taking the same actions against any workers who wear their own personal protective equipment (PPE), such as masks, faceguards, or gloves, at any worksite where the PPE (1) provides a higher level of protection than the PPE afforded by the employer or other entity covered by the Act, (2) is recommended by the applicable public health agencies, and (3) does not prevent the workers from performing their jobs or fulfilling their duties. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm
Dental Court’s Reasoning and Holding Do Not Support an Active-Supervision Inquiry That Depends on the Risk of Self-Dealing 1. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
Similarly, Salahuddin's contention that he was an agent of ROMSA for the purpose of hiring counsel for the entity to defend it against a simple declaratory judgment action relative to the June 2006 members meeting and election, and thereby to convert ROMSA's status in that action as a mere nominal defendant into an active litigant on one side of this 50-50 membership dispute (complete with counterclaims against the other 50% member) is wholly… [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:38 am
§ 2459b (National Aeronautics and Space Administration); 50 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:47 am
The Act will take effect January 1, 2020. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
” 50 S.W.3d at 450. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:02 am
BennettHeld: A covenant not to compete is enforceable even where the competing former employee does not solicit his former employer's clients or use its confidential information if the scope of the restrictive covenant is limited to reasonable temporal and geographical limits, the employer is protecting legitimate business interests with the covenant, the employee has unique and specialized skills, there is no undue hardship on the employee to comply with the restriction and the public… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
The question of a substantial burden on religious exercise is composed of three questions: (1) what is the adherent’s religious exercise, (2) does the challenged law pressure him to modify that exercise, and (3) is the penalty for noncompliance substantial? [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:06 pm
If enacted, the Act would take effect January 1, 2020. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
The above is bad enough, but what really makes this law unique is the fact that the fine does not go to the copyright owner, which is why the administrative action does not preclude future civil proceedings. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:36 am
Righthaven does not create or publish the works it is suing on. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:06 pm
If enacted, the Act would take effect January 1, 2020. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:02 am
All 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia and three U.S. territories have enacted data breach notification statutes, each with varying definitions of “personal information” and requirements regarding notice to individuals and state regulators when an entity has experienced a breach of the security of its systems. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 3:05 am
Will they be joint, and 50/50? [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:50 pm
It does say that it anticipates only a “limited” number of Connect America funded experiments, with total Connect America support of perhaps $50-100 million. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:27 am
Super. at 549-50. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:35 pm
Senate by an all-Democrat 50-50 party line vote, with Vice President Harris breaking the tie and ensuring passage. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 2:44 am
The subject of the appeal concerned the operation of Article 26(4): "This article prohibits the extension or renewal of insurance and reinsurance agreements concluded before the entry into force of this Regulation, but without prejudice to Article 16(3), it does not prohibit compliance with agreements concluded before that date. [read post]
