Search for: "Doe v. Department of Health & Human Services" Results 641 - 660 of 1,445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Studies by the Department of Health and Human Services, OSHA, FDA and several action groups, including the Environmental Working Group and the American Chemistry Council, began investigating the safety concerns and practices in salons. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Studies by the Department of Health and Human Services, OSHA, FDA and several action groups, including the Environmental Working Group and the American Chemistry Council, began investigating the safety concerns and practices in salons. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
(American Express is a notable exception in that regard, as is, to some extent, Bank of America f/k/a FIA Card Services, N.A.). [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Department of Health and Human Services, permitting it to turn away families “who don’t meet their standards, [although] they refer them to agencies that will, … [which may be] several hours away by car. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Following more than 50 complaints from the public, the ICO’s investigation found that a significant proportion of Colour Coat’s marketing calls selling its services, were to numbers that were registered on the Telephone Preference Service (TPS) and Corporate Telephone Preference Service (CTPS) which is for businesses. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm by Giles Peaker
Assurance was given that as soon as the medical opinion was received the housing department of the Defendant would liaise with the children’s services department to establish whether the further information needed to be taken into account. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:48 am by Abbe Gluck
The IRS’s interpretation accomplishes that goal: Section 1401 can still be read literally because the section that authorizes the federal exchanges, Section 1321, provides that if a state does not establish an exchange under Section 1311, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) “shall . . . establish and operate such Exchange within the State. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]