Search for: "Doe v. Doe, III."
Results 641 - 660
of 10,903
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am
NRDC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
In Buckley v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 2:36 pm
But in 2021, in TransUnion v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 8:56 am
§ 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
This statement does not necessarily deny deference to agency interpretations as it seemingly focused on the first step in the Chevron test, viz whether there is ambiguity in the legislative text with regard to the issue at hand. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
If the respondents win, do they therefore lose, because the logic of their argument makes the funding of the Supreme Court itself--and thus everything it does--unconstitutional? [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C)(1)(v) is referring to awards that were forfeited and the cumulative reported value of that award is $0. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:26 pm
III. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 3:25 am
(iii) pay versus performance disclosure must tagged using in Inline XBRL; (iv) while it is permissible to combine one or more sets of pay versus performance relationship disclosures into one graph, table, or other format, an issuer must still provide separate XBRL tags for each required item; using different XBRL elements to tag the same reported line item on the income statement from period to period; and (v) in situations where an issuer uses a custom tag, the Staff may requests… [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 10:00 am
In JBrick, LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 3:30 am
Question 128D.17 – The fair value of an award that did not meet vesting conditions during the year because the performance or market conditions were not met, but for which there is still potential for the award to vest in the future, should not be subtracted under Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K because it failed to vest in the current year. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 2:15 am
The Board acknowledged that the prompting process may involve creativity, but this does not mean that providing text prompts to Midjourney (even if in a large number as 624 revisions and text prompts) “actually forms the generated images”. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:00 am
Amazon, 2023 FC 1156 and Watson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
§ 2(c)(2)(D)(ii)(III)(aa) (exempting contracts of sale that result in actual delivery within 28 days from the definition of retail commodity transaction); see also Final Interpretive Guidance, Retail Commodity Transactions Involving Certain Digital Assets, 85 FR 37734, 37737–38 (June 24, 2020). 6 Id. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 3:50 am
” Does the Implied Covenant Claim Survive the Limiting Language? [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
III. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 11:50 am
This last proposal does not violate Article III's Compensation Clause, because it does not "diminish" the Justices' "Compensation .... during their Continuance in Office. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]