Search for: "Does 1 - 175" Results 641 - 660 of 1,048
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2019, 2:50 pm by Andrew Hudson
It does not address the potential liability exhaustively as much will depend on the facts of each case and the roles of individuals. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Jorge Miranda
But this does not mean that the AB has not at times come up with findings that are deeply flawed by any standard. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:22 am by LindaMBeale
  But this rule does not apply if the taxpayer knows (or has reason to know) that the estimate is unreasonable (citing Reg. section 1.170A-1(h)(4)(ii)). [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Jorge Miranda
Walker, Jr., op. cit., citing Michael Stokes Paulsen, “Does the Supreme Court’s Current Doctrine of Stare Decisis Require Adherence to the Supreme Court’s Current Doctrine of Stare Decisis? [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 10:10 am by Maria Kendrick
It has been reported that the UK is taking an “active role” in shaping the EU’s VAT regulations expected from 2020.[2] Does this mean that the UK will stay aligned with the EU VAT area after Brexit? [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
The plan, such as it is, is that AIG is going to fund the first $175 million following the settlement’s preliminary approval. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:41 am by Brian A. Comer
  I may convert this survey to an article that does a better job of summarizing the law, as opposed to surveying the cases. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:36 pm
The term "foreign experiences" does surface in "For Justice Marshall," 71 Texas Law Review 1125 (1993), Kagan's tribute to her then-just-departed Boss. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 8:04 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Harman’s lawsuit led a Texas jury to impose $175 million in damages against Trinity last month, a figure that could be tripled by statute, meaning the company could face liability exceeding $1 billion. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 9:17 am
Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 188 (1981) and State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 3:46 pm
McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 175 n.1 (1989).In Justice Scalia's Johnson dissent, which the majority adopts in Patterson, he explained the reason why congressional inaction lacks persuasive force:[O]ne must ignore rudimentary principles of political science to draw any conclusions regarding that intent from the failure to enact legislation. [read post]