Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2024, 11:33 am
They operate from physical premises in the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 1:18 pm
” Communications to or from federal, state, local or tribal government employees, who are U.S. persons or located in the United States, will not be intentionally selected and if inadvertently retrieved treated in accordance with the above rules regarding domestic communications/U.S. persons communications. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Louisiana 15-8114 Issues: (1) Whether, when counsel fully concedes the client’s guilt to all charges over the client’s express objection, counsel’s performance amounts to a complete failure to subject the prosecution’s case to meaningful adversarial testing so that the United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
Zubaydah v Foreign and Commonwealth Office and others, heard 14th June 2023. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
What does this mean? [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 7:53 am
United States Attorneys’ Manual 9-16.050. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
In a 2013 state AG enforcement action against Midland for illegal debt collection practices, its servicer, and its parent company, the Texas Attorney General averred that the price Midland pays is 3.3% of the face value of the debt.Excerpt from State's Amended Original Petition in Cause No, 2011-40626 - STATE OF TEXAS (ACTING BY AND THROUGH ATTORNEY GEN vs. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 5:47 am
[They] have commenced tens of thousands of actions in the District Courts of the United States in the past five years, the overwhelming majority of which have resulted either in default judgments or extortionate settlements far in excess of any actual damages incurred by Counter-Defendants... [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:33 pm
KG v Commission of the European Communities, Case 26-76: 1) the goods the company resells require a selective distribution system; 2) the company’s resellers are appointed based on objective and qualitative criteria that are applied in a non-discriminatory fashion and; 3) the restrictions do not go beyond what is necessary. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
In a 2013 enforcement action against Midland, its servicer, and its parent company, the Texas Attorney General averred that the price Midland pays is 3.3% of the face value of the debt.Excerpt from State's Amended Original Petition in Cause No, 2011-40626 - STATE OF TEXAS (ACTING BY AND THROUGH ATTORNEY GEN vs. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
Glaeser and Andrei Schleifer, The Rise of the Regulatory State[1] Journal of Economic Literature XLI:401-425 (2003). [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 12:04 pm
United States (2011) for the proposition that claims based on structural provisions of the Constitution are justiciable. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm
SCR 60.04(4) does not apply. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
The United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is but one example. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:16 am
This is the majority view in the United States. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
IB noted that it, as a direct-access, online brokerage firm, does not provide investment or trading advice. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 9:27 am
Bank v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 11:31 am
These cases are pursued as criminal matters by the AUSAs in the appropriate Office of the United States Attorney General’s Office. [read post]
