Search for: "Does 1-96" Results 641 - 660 of 2,165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
) [1] Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan v Federation of Pakistan and ors 1954 SHC 81. [2] See e.g. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:51 pm
 However, that does not mean to say all is well and resolved in the non-patent IP world. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:15 am
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 96 [week ending on Sunday 15 May] Takedown request tactics in Italy | Wines, spirits, cheese & GI infringement | EU report on GI infringement published | Merpel on latest developments at EPO | Does UPC spell disaster for the EPO boards of appeal? [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 8:05 am by Wolfgang Demino
Even more so when the fees must be paid up front and when the would-be appellant does not have the money. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 8:05 am by Wolfgang Demino
Even more so when the fees must be paid up front and when the would-be appellant does not have the money. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:27 pm by Lisa Solomon
Op. 01-31: (1) Engagement of Contract Attorneys; (2) Referral Fees to Lawyer Referring Contract Attorney Md. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 2:35 pm
I find that the fact that they were stored and maintained there with some involvement by Dina, with a portion of them on display, does not make them "household furnishings" within the definition contained in s. 96(1) of the EAA.Accordingly, the gun collection will not go to Dina Zeitler. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
However, this does not justify the conclusion that rehydrated platelets form part of claim 1 contrary to its wording.[3.3] An additional objection of the ED under A 84 was directed to the breadth of the claims. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
R 140 does not pave the way to re-examination of the factual or legal issues on which a decision was based, nor to reversal of any conclusion derived by the deciding body from a consideration of these issues (see T 367/96 [2]). [2] In the present case, it was clearly the intention of the Board in the above decision T 1468/08 to decide upon a single claim of a single request, reference being made hereto in the point IV of the Facts and Submissions of said decision, the Facts and… [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In contrast to this - in examples 1 and 2 of the patent in suit, 96% and 95%, respectively, of the N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone was recovered at a purity of 99.9% by weight […]. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
[2.1] It is established jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal, see inter alia J 7/82, T 94/84 and T 135/96, that the right to be heard enshrined in A 113(1) also guarantees the right to have relevant grounds that could potentially influence the outcome taken into account in the written decision. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:04 am by Brad Pauley
   As it does every year, the report underscores how rarely the Court grants review. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It is to be noted in this context that this assertion does not correspond to the content of the client’s letter because it does not contain any indications on the scope of the patent protection to be obtained […]. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:41 am by Susan Brenner
MySpace Inc., 175 Cal.App.4th 561, 96 Cal.Rptr.3d 148 (California Court of Appeals 2009). [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 11:08 am
Does Cronin have what it takes to step up to the next level? [read post]