Search for: "Does I & II" Results 641 - 660 of 23,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2013, 8:16 am by Robert Chesney
  In that regard, as Charlie’s story reminds us, it does not appear that the 9/11 prosecution itself would be mortally wounded by the demise of these charges. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:50 am by Jeff Welty
Come back next week for Part II of this series, where I’ll try to sort out whether a legacy drug dog’s alert provides probable cause to search a vehicle given that the alert may be based on the presence of legal hemp. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 10:19 am
This list does not aspire to be exhaustive, although I hope it is at least representative of the depth and breadth of the available literature. [read post]
On March 22, 2023, the German Conference of Independent Supervisory Authorities (“SAs”) adopted an opinion on websites that offer users a choice between (i) a free version that tracks users’ behavior or (ii) a (usually paid) version that does not track users’ behavior. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:34 am by Lyle Denniston
  This Part II discusses the close tie between the mandate and new obligations for expanded insurance coverage. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:20 am by Matt C. Bailey
Of note, I just stumbled across an insightful UCL certification opinion out the Northern District addressing the issue of predominance, post Tobacco II. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
It does not and should not matter where an amendment is made. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 5:02 am by John Harrison
  All legislative power the Constitution grants is given to Congress, and the Vesting Clause of Article I does not style that grant as an exception to the executive power later given in Article II. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 3:18 pm
I recently wrapped up my Con Law II (civil liberties) course here at Georgia. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 3:17 pm by Tom Smith
I look forward to learning what measures Stanford plans to take to restore a culture of intellectual freedom.These are crucial steps. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:30 am by Mazzola Law Office P.C.
That case referred to express indemnity classifications as Type I, II, or III. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 8:37 pm by Michael Froomkin
(Art II, Cl. 3: “The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves”.) [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:58 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
I always get a kick out of the remarkably short memory span of the collective intelligence in the world. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:16 pm by Marty Lederman
In order even to qualify as a “religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society” eligible for this exemption, an entity must be “primarily religious,” which requires at a minimum that the entity be (i) a nonprofit organization that (ii) is organized for a religious purpose, (iii) is engaged primarily in carrying out that religious purpose, (iv) holds itself out to the public as an entity for carrying out that religious purpose, and (v)… [read post]