Search for: "Done et al v. United States"
Results 641 - 660
of 710
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
Hernandez, et al, were physicians, pharmacists, a prescription drug wholesaler and software operators charged with conspiracy and trafficking in controlled substances. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 4:06 pm
Epidemiology of Escherichia coli O157:H7 outbreaks, United States, 1982-2002. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 6:26 pm
Epidemiology of Escherichia coli O157:H7 outbreaks, United States, 1982-2002. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:13 pm
(The lead case is Al Maqaleh, et al., v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:34 am
Capital Management, LLC, et al., 06-cv-1413 (February 19, 2009). [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 3:31 am
Gates, et al. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 7:05 am
” The case is Reed Elsevier, et al., v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:45 pm
Novell, Inc. et al, Case No. 06-cv-1950, 2009 U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
At 11 a.m. today, the Court will hear argument in Vermont v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:39 am
Cisco Systems, Inc., et al. 08-cv-089, E.D. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:26 pm
Solicitor General Daryl Joseffer for the United States as amicus. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 2:27 pm
Fox Television Stations, et al.. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
State Bd. of Exam'rs. of Pub. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:30 pm
Ashcroft, et al. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Maybe that means that we'll get it right this time.Anyway, as regular readers of this blog know, Wyeth filed its principal merits brief in Wyeth v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
JOHN DOE I, ET AL. [read post]
21 May 2008, 8:42 am
Water’s Edge Associates, et al., Superior Court of the State of Washington for Clark County, Case No. 05-2-03446-1 (2008) is a good example of how, when allowed adequate discovery, an insurer was able to reveal to the court the true collusive nature of a covenant judgment between the insured and the injured party. [read post]
21 May 2008, 8:42 am
Water’s Edge Associates, et al., Superior Court of the State of Washington for Clark County, Case No. 05-2-03446-1 (2008) is a good example of how, when allowed adequate discovery, an insurer was able to reveal to the court the true collusive nature of a covenant judgment between the insured and the injured party. [read post]
7 May 2008, 7:11 am
., et al. v. [read post]
