Search for: "Dukes v. Dukes"
Results 641 - 660
of 3,525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
In the wake of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 5:37 am
Dukes, Smith v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:23 pm
Moving on, we have Dukes v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:00 am
Here is the abstract:In deciding Meredith v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:15 pm
Supreme Court Reverses Ninth Circuit in Dukes v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:23 am
The current case is Dukes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am
Reports are staring to come in about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am
Reports are staring to come in about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:11 am
Very broadly reading the terms of the 2009 Ashcroft v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 11:38 am
Ten months after originally doing so, divided three-judge Ninth Circuit panel again affirms the class certification order in Dukes v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:39 am
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:55 pm
” Wal-Mart v Dukes. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 2:30 am
Richard Schmalbeck (Duke) passed along the Top 44 law schools by academic peer reputation in the just-released 2009 U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:52 am
The case—Dukes v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 7:27 am
The issues in Dukes v Deaton were whether a police officer who threw a diversionary device known as a “flashbang” into a dark room occupied by two sleeping individuals without first visually inspecting the room is entitled to qualified immunity against a section 1983 lawsuit claiming excessive force and whether the officer was entitled to qualified immunity against a complaint of assault and battery. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:39 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Dukes. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Many of those signing on were on the professors' brief filed in Matrixx v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:19 am
Dukes adopted a narrow interpretation of the commonality requirement in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a), and its decision in AT& T Mobility v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 8:51 am
The en banc decision in Dukes v. [read post]