Search for: "EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES"
Results 641 - 660
of 7,216
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Human rights experts and advocates have long pointed out gaps, blind-spots, and implementation half-measures that challenge Canada’s standing as a human rights champion. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the Fair Housing Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, and Equal Credit Opportunity Act were, in part, driven by similar issues. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 3:06 pm
As Jonathan Guadian argues, it’s critically important for civil rights and employment lawyers to advocate for immigrant workers. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Protesters’ Rights Resource Kit LexisNexis® supports the efforts of the organizations featured in this resource kit and all advocates who work to advance racial equality and justice. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
In Mallory, the Supreme Court Majority ruled that any corporation registered to do business in a state which requires out-of-state businesses to consent to general personal jurisdiction waives its right to assert a Due Process challenge to jurisdiction in that state. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
” Tracking of race and racial disparities is necessary because, as she puts it succinctly, “equality requires acknowledgment of inequality. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:01 am
On June 20, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose rulings apply to all Texas employers) delivered a blow to advocates of LGBTQ rights in the workplace when it sided with a self-described Christian business whose policies discriminated against gays. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:01 am
On June 20, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose rulings apply to all Texas employers) delivered a blow to advocates of LGBTQ rights in the workplace when it sided with a self-described Christian business whose policies discriminated against gays. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 8:30 pm
We champion equal protection and equal opportunity. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
It’s especially galling that the court cloaked an attack on integration in the equal-protection clause of the 14th Amendment and the Brown v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 10:56 am
A good attorney will be an advocate for your rights and be willing to listen to your story without judgment. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
To the contrary, they explicitly clarified that the equality sought by the law was not one in which all men shall be “six feet high”; rather, it strove to ensure that freedmen enjoy “equal rights before the law” such that “each man shall have the right to pursue in his own way life, liberty, and happiness. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
I am not fully convinced these arguments are right. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
Throughout my legal career, I have dedicated myself to advocating for the rights of everyday individuals who have been harmed or lost their lives due to negligence or the presence of unreasonably dangerous products. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:46 am
When paternity has been established, both parents have equal parenting rights under the law and any custody decisions the court makes are based on the best interest of the child doctrine. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 1:50 pm
Teachers are rights-carrying individuals with their own freedom of speech and freedom of religion. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Protesters’ Rights Resource Kit LexisNexis® supports the efforts of the organizations featured in this resource kit and all advocates who work to advance racial equality and justice. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:28 pm
Witnesses will provide testimony on the range and scope of corporate complicity in human rights viola [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
In that case, the Court concluded that a stay pending an interlocutory appeal “is not a matter of right,” but is to be guided by district court reference to four traditional factors: (1) likelihood of success on the merits, (2) irreparable injury, (3) injury to other parties, and (4) the public interest. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:11 am
” The Court noted that the anti-social behaviour order was disproportionate and infringed upon the Applicant’s rights to equality before the law and to freely communicate due to the failure to tailor the civil order to show the recurrence of the offending behaviour coupled with the broad definition of anti-social behaviour. [read post]
