Search for: "Element Owners Association" Results 641 - 660 of 2,680
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
     Skidmore: it is not enough to assert “a ‘combination of unprotectable elements’ without explaining how these elements are particularly selected and arranged. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“[T]o avoid preemption, bad faith must be alleged and ultimately proven, even if bad faith is not otherwise an element of the tort claim. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:14 am by D. Brad Hughes, Esq.
The post Governing a Community Association through COVID-19: Common Elements appeared first on Jimerson Birr Law Firm. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:14 am by D. Brad Hughes, Esq.
The post Governing a Community Association through COVID-19: Common Elements appeared first on Jimerson Birr Law Firm. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:08 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
In particular, in inter partes proceedings the patent owner and the opposition party should be a remain the “master” of the proceedings. [read post]
It could also be specified that the license covers patent applications, supplementary protection certificates and all elements reasonably required for the commercialization of the invention. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:59 am by CMS
In this post, Dominic Pugh, an associate in the Real Estate Disputes team at CMS, comments on the decision handed down earlier in November 2020 in Alexander Devine Children’s Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions Ltd [2020] UKSC 45. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 6:36 am by erin
A business owner who failed to repair potentially dangerous elements of their business property could be negligent. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:02 am by Léon Dijkman
Xiaomi had argued in the proceedings that the LTE standard does not cover all elements of Sisvel’s patent claims – which means that such patent is non-essential and accordingly no infringement occurs. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court nonetheless addressed other elements of the Lanham Act claim. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by Kelsey Landau
Beneficial ownership transparency is supported by senior FBI officials, the National Sheriffs’ Association, the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association and dozens of national security experts. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 2:00 pm by Olivia Cross
 To establish a claim for copyright infringement, a Plaintiff must show that (1) they own the copyright to the work that was allegedly copied; and (2) that the Defendant copied protected elements of the work. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:06 am by Kristian Soltes
The BRC, together with the British Independent Retailers Association, Association of Convenience Stores, Federation of Small Business and UKHospitality have come together to call for decisive action from the Competition and Markets Authority to tackle increasing scheme fees. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 5:47 am by Hans C. Wahl, Esq.
Common expenses include the expenses of operating, maintaining, repairing, replacing, or protecting the common elements and association property, costs of carrying out the powers and duties of the association, and other expenses. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 5:47 am by Hans C. Wahl, Esq.
Common expenses include the expenses of operating, maintaining, repairing, replacing, or protecting the common elements and association property, costs of carrying out the powers and duties of the association, and other expenses. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:30 pm by Michael Lowe
” Under this legal doctrine, the parents – as owners of the vehicle – can be held financially liable for the negligent driving of their teenage son or daughter if it is shown with admissible evidence that the elements of “negligent entrustment” defined by the Texas Supreme Court in Schneider v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:23 am
"Section 2(a) False Connection: To prove a false suggestion of a connection claim under Section 2(a), a party must, as the first element, show that the mark is a "close approximation" of the claimant's identity. [read post]
It reasoned that Caltrans public statements of its intent to issue a NOD for the project after the FEIR review period were enough to establish a disputed question of fact as to whether the elements of estoppel could be met. [read post]