Search for: "Ellis v. Ellis" Results 641 - 660 of 1,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2017, 1:08 am
In The new unjustified threats bill – do's and dont’s, former InternKat Ellie Wilson gives her point of view on how to best approach the new provisions.Don't miss out! [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” At Law360 (subscription required), Alan Ellis and others weigh in on United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 2:12 am by Dennis Crouch
Kirkland & Ellis Supreme Court lawyer Jay Lefkowitz filed the petition with Bruce Gerstein on the other side. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The defendant must affirmatively demonstrate the absence of one of the elements of legal malpractice, rather than merely pointing out gaps in the plaintiff’s proof (see Quantum Corporate Funding, Ltd. v Ellis, 126 AD3d 866, 871). [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:51 am by Lai Yip
On November 25, 2013, the jury in TQP Development, LLC v. 1-800-Flowers.com, et al., U.S.D.C., E.D. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:01 am
Representing Glaxo: Kirkland & Ellis’s Daniel Sean Trainor and Elizabeth Locke. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 10:16 am
Case Name: Concerned Citizens of Spring Creek Ranch v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“It is a defendant’s burden, when it is the party moving for summary judgment, to demonstrate affirmatively the merits of a defense, which cannot be sustained by pointing out gaps in the plaintiff’s proof” (Quantum Corporate Funding, Ltd. v Ellis, 126 AD3d 866, 871; see Bivona v Danna & Assoc., P.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The defendant must affirmatively demonstrate the absence of one of the elements of legal malpractice (see Quantum Corporate Funding, Ltd. v Ellis, 126 AD3d 866, 871). [read post]