Search for: "Evans v. Backes"
Results 641 - 660
of 852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2024, 7:32 am
Evans, COA23-1160, ___ N.C. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Trolls: The Justice Gap reports on a new campaign “calling on the police and social media sites to take online abuse seriously” and to back what it says is the “first private prosecution brought by an individual against internet trolls“. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am
http://bit.ly/LPLQcg (Bob Ambrogi) Model Behavior: Federal and State Court Rules on eDiscovery - - http://bit.ly/Mk6eHa (Jessica Mederson) Phase 2 of Discovery Pilot Provides Glimpse into Future of eDiscovery – - http://bit.ly/Oxc1V6 (BLLAWG) Robots Are Not Replacing eDiscovery Lawyers - http://bit.ly/MkKifa (Jason Krause) Rules for eDiscovery Vendors in D.C.: Taking A Step Back - http://bit.ly/Lt2hP4 (Cynthia Courtney)… [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:04 pm
Department of Justice v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm
We’d need some sort of marketing standard to get some transfer back to authors.Q: effect of illegal copies? [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Rev. 159-171 (2010).Percival, Robert V. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Under precedents going back to 1914 (Weeks v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:16 am
Meanwhile, it is reported that the perjury trial of former News of the World Andy Coulson in the High Court in Edinburgh has been put back to 11 May 2015. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:47 pm
We need to go right back to basics here. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 2:00 am
Her Honour addressed this (at paragraphs 34-37) and concluded that that amount should not be added back. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
The case presents the question whether the residual clause of the career offender sentencing guideline was unconstitutionally vague back before United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
These are Evans v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
Meirion Jones, editor of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, revealed last week that The Sun attempted to expose Jimmy Savile as a paedophile in 2008, while he was still alive, but were forced to back down because, in Jones’ words, Britain’s “arcane libel laws protect the wicked. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:38 am
Stations should ask the sponsor of any attack ad for documentation backing up their claims, review the supporting material to see if it in fact backs up the claims made, and consult with their attorneys to determine if it is likely actionable. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 8:18 am
(Note that there have been statements from some Supreme Court justices that suggest that this standard that arose in a case, NY Times v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
I'll be back next year! [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 12:45 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 3:52 am
In Pennsylvania last year, the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Renchenski v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:03 pm
As Justice Scalia said in concluding his dissent in Kansas v. [read post]
