Search for: "Fair v. Poole"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,034
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2013, 5:56 am
Robart will hold a Microsoft v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
[Spier v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 11:06 am
Cedar Fair (2012), S195031. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:18 am
In the recent case (Thornber v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 5:00 am
Matamoros v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:00 pm
There have been many, many post-trial machinations following this summer's $1.05 billion patent infringement verdict in Apple v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
F.T.C. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 5:45 am
The case is entitled Matamoros et al v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 3:54 pm
However, in the case of Batson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:00 am
In Friddle v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:10 pm
Massachusetts' fair cross section-type argument predates and is cited within Batson v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:19 am
Also, as far as Microsoft's H.264-essential patents are concerned, Motorola could easily license them under the terms of the MPEG LA AVC/H.264 pool, anytime -- as its corporate parent, Google, already has.At any rate, Motorola uses the terms of a grant-back license as an argument in the Microsoft case for the claim that its original royalty demand (which corresponded to a $4 billion annual royalty figure) was FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory). [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 5:30 am
This case comes from the Dallas Court, which has seen its fair share of this litigation. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
The very first bill he signed as president was the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which restored the protection to victims of pay discrimination that had been gutted by the Supreme Court in its 2007 ruling in Ledbetter v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:50 pm
See Cox v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 8:51 am
Here’s a quick chronology, as set forth in the relevant court opinion, Stewart v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 12:35 pm
It has dug itself a hole, not only because it asked for 2.25% in the beginning but especially because it kept digging and digging as the process evolved, such as by admitting that a "blatantly unreasonable" initial demand would constitute a breach of contract.By contrast, if Microsoft had concluded that a fair rate is not just the pool rate but, say, ten times the pool rate, Microsoft could offer that rate or something close to it. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
As compared to earlier affirmative action cases, relatively little is really at stake in Fisher v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:30 pm
Lazarus This article was originally published in the Delaware Business Court Insider | September 5, 2012 Since Kahn v. [read post]
