Search for: "Fell v. Fell" Results 641 - 660 of 12,752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
The judge determined that "[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright" (referring to the decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
The judge determined that "[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright" (referring to the decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony). [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
And, in any event, the employer's version of the facts wasn’t “material,” given its concession that no lifting devices (as required by law) had been supplied.The AD1 sure closed the door on that ….# # #DECISIONJFT v 1211 6th Ave. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Santiago Stocker
In fact, analysis of historical data from 1946-2022, cross-referenced with regime-type data from V-Dem, reveals that a successful coup has never occurred in a liberal democracy in Sub-Saharan Africa. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
”Given those unrebutted facts, the AD2 thought the court below had correctly decided in CC favor’s and it left the liability finding undisturbed.Guess those defendants will now have to roll over ….# # #C. v 455 Ocean Assoc., LLC [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am by Rose Hughes
In Ensygnia v Shell, Miss Charlotte May KC (sitting as Deputy Judge in the High Court of England and Wales) considered how a post-grant amendment which added the phrase that certain embodiments "fell outside the scope of the claims", might affect claim interpretation. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:19 am by INFORRM
This contribution argues that Sanchez v France takes an untenable position regarding third-party liability for content on social media. [read post]