Search for: "Frye v Frye" Results 641 - 660 of 682
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
Cystic Fibrosis Chapter 6917 Arlington Road, Suite 308 Bethesda, MD 20814 Phone: (301) 657-8444; (877) 657-8444 (Toll Free) Fax: (301) 652-9571 E-mail: metro-dc@cff.org Web: http://www.cff.orgmetrodc.htm Developmental Disabilities State Developmental Disabilities Planning Council MD Developmental Disabilities Council 300 West Lexington Street, Box 10 Baltimore, MD 21201-2323 Phone: (410) 333-3688 (V/TTY); (800) 305-6441 (Toll Free in MD only) E-mail: info@md-council.org Web:… [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
Frye Issue: Whether the Court’s decision on political firings in Elrod v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 9:12 am
Bryan Rose, following a Frye hearing, excluded the testimony of a forensic fingerprint examiner because the "ACE-V" methodology of latent fingerprint examination is more likely than not "a subjective, untested, unverifiable identification procedure that purports to be infallible. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
CVS Pharmacy, 764 N.E.2d 814, 819-20 (Mass. 2002); Frye v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 6:05 pm
The appellate court disagreed, finding that the defense expert's methodology, using a computer-based mathematical model to evaluate the delivery, did not meet the requirements of Frye v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 1:38 am
Oberlander             Subscription Required SUFFOLK COUNTYTorts'Frye' Hearing Ordered to Determine if Plaintiffs May Submit Evidence Regarding MCSS at Trial O'Brien v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:52 am
Loretta Frye (see 4/30/07 ILB entry here - medical negligence) Erica Lockett v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 1:12 am
Van Kipnis, defendant-respondent NEW YORK COUNTYCivil PracticeHospital Fails to Establish Entitlement to 'Frye' Hearing or Preclusion of Plaintiff's Experts C v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:31 pm
The court held that the so-called Frye test for determining the admissibility of expert testimony, see Frye v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 7:00 am
The Maryland Supreme Court agreed with the Court of Appeals unanimous decision that a Frye-Reed hearing is necessary to determine the validity of expert witness testimony in the case of Josephine Chesson, et al. v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 8:55 am
SECOND AMENDMENT UPDATE: Brian Frye looks at the history of U.S. v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Frye that offers new insight on U.S. v. [read post]