Search for: "GRATE v. STATE" Results 641 - 660 of 1,046
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am by LII Team
”Lea V., law professor emerita  “I’m very grateful to Cornell LII and its tireless staff for providing free and up-to-date access to the United States Code and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence, plus its US Supreme Court advance sheets provided under its Hermes Project. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 8:14 am by Joy Yusi
It is perfectly in line with the law of Canada for the past 20+ years, as articulated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Eldridge v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[1] Thus, for example, Graber showed, among his many other myth-busting insights, that Marbury v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Class 46) Ghana Victor Tieku to develop new copyright collecting org in Ghana (Afro-IP) India Bombay HC rules on copyright in drawings: Part II: Indiana Gratings v Anand Udyog (Spicy IP) Delay in filing power of attorney: Does it prejudice a patent application? [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm by Daly Barnett
It’s been a long two years since the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 7:28 am
Should we be grateful they didn't label it a "cat fight"? [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 9:06 am
" In front of an audience that was inured to political defeat - the 20th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm by Ilya Somin
While, certainly, not all members of these groups are poor or politically weak, a disproportionately large number are.Finally, in Part III I explain why the problem of abusive takings persists despite the wave of state reform laws adopted in response to the Supreme Court’s unpopular decision upholding economic development takings in Kelo v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 3:29 am
A couple weeks back, I highlighted two 8th District cases on search and seizure issues, one of which was State v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:13 am by Rick Garnett
It animated his final Religion Clauses opinion, a 2022 dissent in Carson v. [read post]