Search for: "Garrett v. Garrett" Results 641 - 660 of 910
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2012, 12:38 pm by Julie Lam
Garrett, No. 144213, the Michigan Supreme Court vacated the sentences of the trial court, and remanded the case for resentencing. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:37 am by Steve Lash
– Whom would you represent in the case of R2-D2 v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:08 pm by nflatow
Epps goes on to explain that the very same decision that established judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:33 pm by Simon Gibbs
The Costs Law Articles Archive section of Legal Costs Central has been updated with a couple of articles from 2006 dealing with failure to meditate and the Myatt v National Coal Board and Garrett v Halton Borough Council judgments. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:59 am by nflatow
A 7-2 decision in favor of the prisoner in a third case, Martinez v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:35 am by xsimpledemo
Devenney The Indiana Supreme Court ruled today in the Hunt Construction Group v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:35 am by xsimpledemo
Devenney The Indiana Supreme Court ruled today in the Hunt Construction Group v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Although disparate impact may be relevant evidence of discrim­ination such evidence is insufficient to prove a constitutional violation even where the Fourteenth Amendment subjects state ac­tion to strict scrutiny, the plurality explained, citing Board of Trustees of Univ of Ala v Garrett (8 ADD ¶8-198). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:10 am by Heidi Henson
Although disparate impact may be relevant evidence of discrimination such evidence is insufficient to prove a constitutional violation even where the Fourteenth Amendment subjects state action to strict scrutiny, the plurality explained, citing Board of Trustees of Univ of Ala v Garrett. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:32 pm by Aaron Barkoff
  I'll be part of a panel discussion entitled, "Of Labels, Patents and Use Codes: The Significance and Possible Repercussions of Novo Nordisk v. [read post]