Search for: "General Motors, LLC"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2022, 8:02 pm
General Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977 (11th Cir. 2016). [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 1:17 pm
Our firm has also handled many shareholder and LLC disputes between owners of closely held corporations, and LLCs. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
General Motors has no right to representation on the board but can designate a "board observer" to attend the meetings. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:11 pm
Second, the court based the decision, at least in part, on the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Encino Motor Cars, LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 10:46 am
Luckily, residents of Spring Hill can place their trust in the hands of Whittel & Melton, LLC. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
Inside the bankruptcy process, the Gages are likely to be “general unsecured creditors. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
On review, the Ninth Circuit panel majority concluded that the district court abused its discretion in issuing the injunction: “because AB5 is a generally applicable labor law that affects a motor carrier’s relationship with its workforce and does not bind, compel, or otherwise freeze into place the prices, routes, or services of motor carriers, it is not preempted by the FAAAA. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
Footnotes: [1] Generally, Chrysler LLC, et. al., Case No. 09-50002 (AJG) (Bankr. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:39 am
Similarly, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (Alliance), representing 11 vehicle manufacturers including BMW Group, Chrysler Group LLC, Ford Motor Company, General Motors, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz USA, Mitsubishi Motors, Porsche, Toyota and Volkswagen; also opposes the waiver. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 3:30 am
About the only disappointing thing about this battle royal, entitled Matter of Marciano (Champion Motor Group, Inc.), is that the plaintiff’s first name isn't Rocky.This first of five consecutive postings on the Marciano case summarizes the underlying facts. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
Mazda Motor, Inc., 131 S. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:00 am
(Karl Knauz Motors Inc., 358 N.L.R.B. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
Chung, Mong Koo and Hyundai Motor Company v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 1:59 pm
The experienced Oregon child injury attorneys at Kaplan Law LLC are here to help. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
General Motors, 271 F.3d 583, 589 (4th Cir. 2001)).It may be possible to reach a stipulation as to the extent of preservation required in a given case. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:17 pm
” Qualifying income is generally passive-type income, such as interest, dividends, and rent. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy IP)… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy IP)… [read post]