Search for: "Goldstein v. United States"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,090
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2014, 1:06 pm
As an amicus, the United States argued that such intent might be implicit in the bilateral investment treaty at issue. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:39 am
” At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson notes that judges in several lower courts have relied on Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:40 pm
The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America 13-449Issue: (1) Whether the First Amendment permits civil courts to retroactively impose a “trust” on church property based on church canons that were never embodied in any secular instrument of property ownership and did not comply with state law at the time of their adoption; (2) whether the Contracts Clause permits civil courts resolving church property disputes to apply changes to… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
United States] we see no ground for reaching a different conclusion here. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am
United States, in which the Court – again divided six to three – held that a criminal defendant whose assets have been frozen before his trial does not have a right to a hearing to challenge the probable cause for his indictment, even if he needs the money to hire a lawyer to defend him against the charges. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm
United States 13-392Issue: (1) Whether, in the context of a First-Amendment-protected contribution to a judicial campaign, the McCormick v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am
Also at The Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr outlines “some of the possible Fourth Amendment rules that the Court might consider” in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
United States 13-564Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to an amicus in this case, which is listed without regard to the likelihood that it will be granted.Issue: (1) Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 4:37 am
At Talking Points Memo, Sahil Kapur examines the extent to which the lower courts have relied on last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:53 am
California – police authority under Fourth Amendment to search a smartphone taken from an individual at the time of arrest United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:28 am
United States, in which the Court limited the availability of enhanced sentences for drug dealers whose customers die or suffer serious injuries. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:02 pm
United States 13-564 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to an amicus in this case, which is listed without regard to the likelihood that it will be granted. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am
United States, the Court limited the availability of enhanced sentences for drug dealers whose customers die or suffer serious injuries. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
California and United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
Bridges 13-657Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution allows States to tax goods distributed by out-of-state wholesalers more heavily than goods distributed by in-state wholesalers. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
Briefly: In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses last week’s grant in the two cell phone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
Bridges 13-657Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution allows States to tax goods distributed by out-of-state wholesalers more heavily than goods distributed by in-state wholesalers. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
California and United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am
In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
