Search for: "Gonzales v. United States" Results 641 - 660 of 747
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2007, 4:02 am
According to DOJ's press release (June 1), the law would:Double the penalty for transferring a firearm that will be used to commit a crime of violence or drug trafficking offense;increasethe maximum penalty under the general conspiracy statute;amend the "armed career criminal statute to create a tiered penalty approach for felons with prior drug trafficking or violent felony convictions;"lengthen the statute of limitations for violent crimes and terrorism-related crimes;"create a… [read post]
30 May 2007, 6:35 pm
This appeal concerns two final Board of Immigration Appeals determinations that impact Ali Jaber's right to remain in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:06 pm
(It would bear some resemblance to the facts underlying Ohralik v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 12:53 am
But while European companies can breathe a little easier in the United States, there's increasing unease at home about the emergence of European equivalents to the U.S. [read post]
19 May 2007, 4:55 am
This is quite a sensible ruling.This case involves confused identities, which made it impossible for ICE to prove that the man in the courtroom was not a United States citizen. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:52 am
Splenda case, or, as it's officially known, Merisant Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 8:04 am
" — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in her dissent to Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 8:06 am by Orrin Johnson
So suggests Professor Geoffrey Stone on the University of Chicago Law School's Faculty Blog, blaming our "faith based justices" for the Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 2:15 am
UNITED STATES - ScaliaNot much to go on, I know. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:17 pm
On Wednesday, April 18, 2007, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in a pair of abortion related cases: Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
The two most enlightening ones are his concurrence in US v Lopez and his dissent in Gonzales v Raich. [read post]