Search for: "Goodwill, Inc." Results 641 - 660 of 1,382
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am by Jani
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am by Glenn R. Reiser
Protameen Chemicals, Inc., 160 N.J. 352, 368 (1999) (“Balsamides“), and Lawson Mardon Wheaton, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
., Inc., 973 F.2d 1033, 1046 (2d Cir. 1992) (house brands can prevent confusion). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
 Anyway, now we can put you out of your misery: the sequel is Hearst Holdings Inc & Another v A.V.E.L.A. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 10:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” The Foundation also alleged goodwill in marks such as “Lieutenant General Milton G. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
  Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] [noted by the IPKat here] established that, even if most people are not deceived, passing off can still be proved. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:08 am by Epstein Becker Green
CVS More recently, in February 2014, the EEOC filed a complaint against CVS Pharmacy, Inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 10:02 pm by Benjamin Chapman, PhD
-based food industry public relations firm Charleston Orwig Inc. [read post]