Search for: "Grant Thornton" Results 641 - 660 of 673
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  (Recall that the Anderson respondents urged the Court to grant the Trump and Republican Party petitions for certiorari because “the weighty Fourteenth Amendment questions here warrant the Court’s attention even in the absence of a split, and this case presents an ideal vehicle for resolving them. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:26 am by Benson Varghese
If the Respondent does not respond, the court may grant a default divorce. 7. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Some notes on vexing issue, which fortunately has never serious issue for me. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Brown Case Number: 15-cv-05843 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania) Date Filed: October 27, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 6, 2015 12/23/2015 3/22/2016 2015-137 In the Matter of Grant Thornton, LLP Administrative Proceeding File No.: 3-16976 Date Filed: December 2, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 2, 2015 In the Matter of Melissa K. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction Corporate Income Tax Changes Individual Income Tax Changes Sales and Use Tax and Gross Receipts Tax Changes Tobacco and Vapor Tax Changes Transportation Tax Changes Sports Betting Tax Changes Miscellaneous Tax Changes Notable Tax Rate Changes Retroactive to January 1, 2021 Key Findings Thirteen states have notable tax changes taking effect July 1, 2021. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
In the class action, Judge Pfaelzer dismissed claims only against accounting firm Grant Thornton, which was represented by Winston & Strawn. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:26 am by Benson Varghese
If the Respondent does not respond, the court may grant a default divorce. 7. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
The Law Society of British Columbia’s E-Brief for January 2019 states that LSBC has established a Futures Task Force: “… to look at the future of the legal profession and legal regulation in British Columbia. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’  This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:26 am by Benson Varghese
If the Respondent does not respond, the court may grant a default divorce. 7. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 11:26 am by centerforartlaw
By Kimberly Babin Law in general, is not only derivative of ethics, but also necessitates ethical consideration and conduct in its practice.[1]Art law is not immune to that need. [read post]