Search for: "Grant v. Parker" Results 641 - 660 of 730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Epps, No. 0860652 In an Eight Amendment challenge to lethal injection as the method of execution for two death-row inmates, rulings that the applicable statute of limitations barred plaintiffs' section 1983 action and grant of summary judgment to defendant are affirmed where: 1) under Wilson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 10:02 am
Those readers defending PMA medical device defendants should review Parker v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
After that hearing, at which scientific literature was introduced and doctors for both the planitiffs and defendants testified, Justice Mayer ruled that plaintiffs would not be allowed to offer expert testimony at trial in support of their MCS claims:In New York, evidence based on novel scientific theories or techniques is considered admissible only upon a showing of general acceptance within the relevant scientific community (People v Carrieri, 49 AD3d 660, 854 NYS2d 427 [2d Dept 2008];… [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 5:27 am
Everybody defending PMA medical device defendants should read Parker v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Mitchell    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0357p.062008/10/03 Parker v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
The district court granted summary judgment to Defendants and dismissed the complaint. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office)   Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46)   Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango)   Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
S. 354, 360-361 (1959) (constitutional grant "empowered the federal courts . . . to continue the development of [maritime] law"). [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:05 pm
U.S., 07-776), and it refused to hear an appeal by five Washington, D.C., residents who had wanted to take part in the challenge to the city’s ban on handgun possession (Parker, et al., v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:35 am
Lake Erie Corr    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0334n.06 Parker v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:35 am
Lake Erie Corr    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0334n.06 Parker v. [read post]