Search for: "Grant v. Sullivan"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,009
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2020, 7:47 am
" (Thomas v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
Consider the December, 2017 decision of the Appellate Division, Third Department, in Rouis v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
On December 29, 2022, the Second Circuit issued its highly anticipated opinion on remand in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm
For these reasons, we conclude that the temporary restraining order, as well as the permanent injunction restraining Sullivan's speech, constitute unconstitutional prior restraints in derogation of Sullivan's right to speak. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 6:35 pm
Sullivan, S.J., dissents with opinion. [read post]
14 May 2022, 8:30 am
Garrison v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:24 am
The Appellate Division decision below is the latest in a line of cases interpreting Buran as limiting the relation back doctrine to mistakes regarding the identity or status of a proper party (see Matter of Nemeth, 205 AD3d at 1094-1095, citing, inter alia, Matter of Sullivan v Planning Bd. of the Town of Mamakating, 151 AD3d 1518, 1520 [3d Dept 2017]; Branch v Community Coll. of the County of Sullivan, 148 AD3d 1410, 1411-1412 [3d Dept 2017]; Matter of Ayuda Re… [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:05 am
(credit for 2007 Pat Sullivan/AP photo of Texas death chamber) [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:26 am
The district court, relying on this Court’s decision in Streets v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:49 pm
Sullivan and Gertz v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:24 am
., v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
The amendments take effect Jan. 1. 2010.Justices Frank Sullivan and Robert Rucker dissented in part from the amended guidelines because they believed they overrule Grant v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:33 am
Given the need for pronlpt resolution of the issues presented in this case, the following special procedures shall be followed: * * * The Order (7 pages in all) is signed by Chief Justice Shepard, Dickson and Sullivan, JJ., concur. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
In TM v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 9:51 am
Sullivan, United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
The injunction was also granted to the claimant in respect of the harassment claim [41]. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:15 pm
Sullivan, a government speech doctrine case, but something else. [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:04 am
The Court’s agreement to rule on juveniles’ sentencing came in Sullivan v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
E.D., October 25, 2011), Sullivan, J. [read post]
