Search for: "Gray v. District Court"
Results 641 - 660
of 964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
(Class 46) District Court of The Hague: Legal costs: Vetus v Inno Nautic (EPLAW) District Court of The Hague awards claim for ‘rest damage’: ABK Kunststoffen v Snoeks Automotive B.V (EPLAW) New Zealand NZ High Court clears patent attorneys of negligence: The Baby Hammock Co Limited v AJ Park Law (Patentology) Northern Ireland Ploughing a lonely furrow? [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:35 am
It was not argued by either party or decided by the district court. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Zim Direct Marketing LTD (IP Factor) Supreme Court affirms Tel Aviv District Court ruling that where Customs was dealing with the issue, they would not get involved: Imperiat TsaAttsuim vs. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Zim Direct Marketing LTD (IP Factor) Supreme Court affirms Tel Aviv District Court ruling that where Customs was dealing with the issue, they would not get involved: Imperiat TsaAttsuim vs. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
United States (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Gray on Claims) (IPBiz) (IPBiz) (PatLit) CAFC: Another means-plus-function opinion: General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:25 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia 2005). [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(Spicy IP) ‘Tirupati laddus’ granted registration as a geographical indication (Spicy IP) Malaysia Malaysian Federal Court: McDonald’s final defeat by McCurry in trade mark battle (IPKat) Netherlands District Court of The Hague: Procter & Gamble companies win trade mark infringement summary proceedings brought by Debonairre against their Naomi Campbell product line (Class 46) South Africa Copycat… [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
(Kluwer Patent Blog) Sweden Stockholm District Court costs decision – Centraction v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
(IPKat) Copying without infringing: conference report 1 to 4 (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) PCC considers transfer of proceedings to Patent Court in High Court: ALK-Abello v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Its single complaint about the interim map, that it fails to consider state requirements that county boundaries be respected, has long been rejected as a matter of both Voting Rights Act and constitutional (Gray v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:04 am
Destiny Media Tech (Patently-O) (PatLit) District Court E D Texas: Judge Ward to plaintiff: Accept $51 million remittitur or face new trial on damages: LaserDynamics, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:59 am
Rambus Inc (Patently-O) (IAM) District Court New Jersey: Formatting and transmitting data does not satisfy Bilski machine or transformation test: Glory Licensing v Toys’R’Us (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: When are products ‘reasonably similar’ to the accused products? [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:43 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:58 am
" Seven years later, in Gray v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Gray on Claims) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) Despite major changes in Asia, the US is still number one and will be for a while yet (IAM) Is the CAFC pro-patent? [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm
TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of STERNALVEST for sternal vests (TTABlog) District Court C D California: The Mongols have their colors back (for real): U.S. v Cavozos (Property, intangible) District Court S D New York: Numb Nuts, Part II: Olaes Enter., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(Patents4Life) Role of Washington DC District Court in patent cases (Patently-O) Did you know... the prevailing party in a section 337 investigation is not automatically a party on appeal at the Federal Circuit? [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(Patents4Life) Role of Washington DC District Court in patent cases (Patently-O) Did you know... the prevailing party in a section 337 investigation is not automatically a party on appeal at the Federal Circuit? [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 12:33 pm
Church & Dwight Co. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:41 am
Gray County District Attorney Lynn Switzer asked a state district judge last month to grant an order setting an execution for Nov. 9, even as Skinner awaits a federal court ruling on whether prosecutors must turn over DNA evidence for testing that he says will prove his innocence. [read post]
