Search for: "Greene v. White" Results 641 - 660 of 951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2010, 4:50 am by HumaRashid
Blue and green would look great, too! [read post]
23 May 2007, 5:23 am
" In the 2002 case, Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:24 am by Russ Bensing
District Judge, and those of us who’ve had the pleasure of appearing before the latter can guess what happened next: Kelsey Gloston stood in ankle and wrist restraints in court Tuesday afternoon wearing flip flops, a tight white T-shirt, short-shorts and sporting green streaks in her hair. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm by Adam Feldman
Greene’s Energy Group and Impressions Products v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm by Mike
Ball's petition for habeas corpus causing Judge Marilyn Hall Patel to provide an “independent review of the record” See Green v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am by Benjamin Bissell
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:37 am by Guest Barista
In Qualitex v Jacobson, (this was briefly discussed in my earlier blog post of non traditional trademarks) Qualitex sought protection over the green gold colour of their cleansing pads. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Marie Louise
(IPBiz)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC reverses DNH in Markem-Imaje Corporation v Zipher; Newman partially dissents (IPBiz) District Court Nevada: Plaintiff need not produce licenses involving unasserted patents where licenses involving patents-in-suit have been produced: Bally Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am by Guest Blogger
That evening, for the first time, The White House was illuminated with the bright colors of the rainbow. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
CFPB could threaten the Fed’s independence of White House control. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
"[16] But Claiborne Hardware had no occasion to decide whether a person's not dealing with someone based on that someone's race was itself protected by the First Amendment, because it was clear that Mississippi law did not prohibit such private choices not to deal.[17] Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]