Search for: "HALE v. HALE" Results 641 - 660 of 1,471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2010, 11:29 pm by INFORRM
“We need much more serious journalism in this country and our defamation law should encourage rather than discourage it,” said Baroness Hale in Jameel. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:57 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Dissenting, Lady Hale agreed with the principles discussed by Lord Wilson, but held that the Government failed to strike a fair balance between the very limited public benefits of the cap and the severe damage done to the family lives of young children and their lone parents. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:11 am by Iona Millership
  The application for permission to appeal and submissions relevant to appeal were heard by the Supreme Court (Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson) on 21 April 2016. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:30 am by Darryl Hutcheson, Matrix
By contrast, Lady Hale felt that while it was proper to take into account public services which there was a statutory duty to supply ([94]), family support was different. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by Isabel McArdle
However, the second of his examples makes it clear that very adverse consequences for an applicant (or per Baroness Hale, the “extremity of consequences for the individual”) are capable, in combination with a strong argument that there has been an error of law, of amounting to “some other compelling reason.” The examples of Lord Dyson, in the case of Cart v the Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28 were, … (i) a case where it is strongly arguable that the… [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 1:59 pm by Giles Peaker
In her dissenting judgement in R (N) v Lewisham, Baroness Hale expressed puzzlement that that appeared to be the generally accepted view. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 5:29 am
Although its caption suggests a prize fight, when the Supreme Court hears oral arguments tomorrow in No. 06-116, Moylan v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Sales LJ was unconvinced that the criteria set out in Ladd v Marshall [1954] EWCA Civ 1 – intended to reflect the balance of justice in relation to applications to admit fresh evidence – had not been satisfied and KV was unable to demonstrate that evidence such as Dr Cohen’s report could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use earlier. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:15 am by ASAD KHAN
 But Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin did not agree with Sales and Patten LJJ. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 1:15 am
As Baroness Hale made it very clear in MacLeod, this is a job for the legislature, not the judiciary.At number three in the top ten comes McCartney v Mills. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:29 am by Charlie Tomlinson, Olswang LLP
Appeal to the Supreme Court The appeal was heard by the Supreme Court on 10 November 2014 by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
From Tuesday 20 March 2012 over three days are the linked appeals of Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency and Perry & Ors (No. 2) v Serious Organised Crime Agency, which will be heard by a panel of nine (L Phillips, L Hale, L Brown, L Judge, L Kerr, L Wilson, L Clarke, L Reed and Sir Anthony Hughes). [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:02 am by chief
The judgments of Baroness Hale of Richmond JSC and Lord Hope of Craighead DPSC are expressed in terms which appear sanguine about this - see for example Baroness Hale at paragraph 33 and Lord Hope at paragraph 54. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:02 am by chief
The judgments of Baroness Hale of Richmond JSC and Lord Hope of Craighead DPSC are expressed in terms which appear sanguine about this - see for example Baroness Hale at paragraph 33 and Lord Hope at paragraph 54. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  What has been protected is not, in any true sense, “public interest journalism” but is much more akin to what Baroness Hale once called “vapid tittle tattle”. [read post]