Search for: "HILL v. U.S." Results 641 - 660 of 2,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2011, 8:33 am by Howard Friedman
However the court concluded that the parole decision was based on his non-participation in any self-help programs concerning anger management or substance abuse.In Hill v. [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 4:17 am by Matthew Kahn
  In other news, Alice Hill underscored the catastrophic dangers of inaction on climate change in the wake of the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
[We have the following call for papers.]The Department of Religious Studies at Indiana University-Bloomington is hosting a conference entitled “Religious Studies 50 Years after Schempp: History, Institutions, Theory” the weekend of September 27-29, 2013.Fifty years ago the Supreme Court of the United States announced its decision in Abington v Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963). [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
These private citizens and citizens' groups include Michigan Decency Action Council, Inc., Judy Rose, Dar Vander Ark, and Black Hills Citizens for a Better Community (collectively "Non-City Defendants-Appellees"). [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
Stephens, a death penalty case that has its roots in testimony that the defendant was likely to be dangerous in the future because of his race, comes from David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, who also covers the grant in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am by Eric Goldman
Supreme Court ruling in MercExchange v. eBay, which dramatically clipped the legal tools available to patent trolls; Tiffany v. eBay, which redefined secondary trademark infringement online; Section 230’s applicability to online marketplaces (including the Stoner, Gentry, Hill, and Inman cases); and much more. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:38 am
, 545 U.S. 913 (2005) (downloaded files copied from servers or directly from peer-to-peer network); U.S. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:44 am by Chinmayi Sharma
When asked by Chairman Adam Schiff him whether Burisma was included in the call package as a topic to discuss on the call with Zelensky, Morrison’s counsel instructed him not to answer the question, citing U.S. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court, in one of its most historical decisions, Marbury v. [read post]